and the Dangers Half Assed Wildy
In light of the debate regarding the expansion and revival of the wilderness This article will offer an in-depth look at how it might affect the game. I'll also discuss the ways that the new game mechanics developed over the years would be in conflict with the "wildy" that we currently call it, as well as the possible issues.
Let's begin with the wilderness boundaries. Prior to 2007 there was no safe zone. This is the most crucial element of the current wilderness layout. It has safe zones. Although you could argue that they ought to be kept, they hinder the movement of the current fights. They promote the safe zone, and also focuses on fighting around the safe zone.
This makes it impossible to protect the lawless area. This brings up another problem, current activities within the wilderness which weren't present prior to. What is their choice and what effect could this have on the wilderness?
Personally, I'm in favour of moving all the minigames (Clan Wars, FOG and closing off Deamonhiem) to a different locations, however where it gets tricky are the 3 quests. The Defender of Varrock and Summer questline both have large chunks of wilderness. If we believe that the quests will stay, I believe it would be better to restart the entire quest. What does this all mean? It means that you'll be on your own after you've reached the quest start point and have entered the wilderness in he defender varrack story. Although this could slightly alter the story but it won't significantly affect the quest.
Green Dragons, armoured Zombies and Chaos Ele should all be maintained the same. The best location to train is a bit dangerous. The Corporeal beast is a fascinating point. While it might be fun to barrage runners go into the cave, its boss mechanic in RS is distinctive in that you will bank a lot of times due to its risky nature. If the entrance was relocated closer to the border of the wildy, it might prove more attractive since it's currently beyond level 20, which is the cut-off point for telegraphs.
Summoning can be difficult. It would be great to be able to drop anything at any time, exactly as in the rest of RS. The restriction of pouches in such a way feels strange in pvp realms. There is no solution to this problem. Perhaps the best solution is to keep it as "pouchin create, fight goes down"
Last, but not least: Do not create pvp wilderness worlds. Never. The thrill of being in the wild allowed me to do one thing that pvp and bh worlds don't allow that is the most effective handling of that aspect that I have ever seen in any other game.
Pvp meeting pve players. It was possible to use the resources available, like rune, treasure trails and dragons to earn rewards. However, this was not a obligation. As I mentioned earlier, everyone should have access the quests. However, making certain worlds safer defeats the purpose. This is the thing I am most concerned about. If a world is secure from attack that defeats the goal of the quests.
should not use hazardous abysses, since there are perfectly safe ones only a hop away. The zombies who are armored are able to run on safe planets and then hop to dangerous ones after they have gotten free of the wild. This is true for all worlds. This is a request to do not promote the idea of "safe" worlds and the half assed wilderness, it defeats the point and the enjoyment of the wildy.